logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.09.04 2018고단133
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of two years and four months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person of 2018 shall take over any electronic financial transaction access medium.

Defendant

A, along with H, recruited to collect 120,000 won per account from a person without a name (one name "I"; hereinafter "person without a name") who resides in China (hereinafter "person without a name") in order to collect 120,000 won per account.

According to the above public offering, around June 15, 2016, Defendant A instructed H to wear a physical card by putting a phone, and H was transferred to the second apartment near the Green Complex in the name of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Airport, and H was found to have a physical card (credit card number: J) connected to the Saemaul Treasury account in the name of the deceased in his/her name at the same time, and was opened from around 16:40 on the same day, he/she moved from around the 170-ro, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, to the 170-ro, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, and then was opened with a physical card (credit number: L) connected to the company bank account in the name of K.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with H, acquired two physical cards connected to another person’s financial account, which is an access medium to electronic financial transactions.

Defendant A, “2018 High 1033, 1033,” in connection with the telephone finance fraud staff in China, intended and managed a person who withdraws the money deposited in the telephone finance fraud (the so-called cash withdrawal account) and a person who delivers the so-called bank account used for committing fraud (the so-called bank account delivery account) to instruct his detailed criminal acts. Defendant B and M served as a liability for withdrawing cash when the victims deposit the amount of damage into the account and remitting money to the designated account under the direction of Defendant A, and N served as a liability for delivering cash withdrawal to the cash withdrawal account after drawing up the check card, which is the access medium of electronic financial transactions, from the name of the account.

arrow