logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.09.22 2016고단1296
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, with respect to Defendant A, the same shall apply for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On August 10, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Daejeon District Court's official order on August 10, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive August 18, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) on June 26, 2016, on the ground that the “F” in front of the “F in Gyeonggi-si E, Gyeonggi-do around 04:30, 2016, in front of the victim G (19 years of age) is bad, Defendant A was placed in the hand floor once and once he/she suffers a victim’s knife with his/her knife at one time and one time as a drinking, and Defendant B was able to take the head of the victim’s knife with his/her knife by combining it.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

2. Defendant A, at around 04:30 on June 25, 2016, took the Defendant at the front side of the “F” and sent out after being reported 112 on the 110th day before the police officers assigned to the H police box, sent the Defendant at the time of G, and sent the Defendant 1’s chest at the Habro Habro Habro Habro Hadon Hadon I’s clothes at around 04:40 on the same day, when I listen to the statement of damage against G, I took the front side of the “K” in the direction of I’s own hand when I took the front part of I, and Defendant B was arrested as a flagrant offender, and she continued to walk the Defendant 1’s face with the Defendant 1’s driver’s seat while she was arrested as a police officer, and she took the Defendant 1’s seat with the Defendant 1’s driver’s seat.

As a result, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the 112 report processing by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects by the prosecution against the Defendants

1. Police statements made against G, L, or M;

1. A written statement of I;

1. On-site photographs and damaged photographs;

1. A photograph of a CCTV course;

1. Previous convictions: Investigative inquiries about criminal history and investigation reports (defendant A is pending in trial of the court below);

arrow