Text
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
Reasons
1. The facts charged [2019cc. 567] around 15:10 on January 22, 2019, the Defendant used the victim’s clothes in his hand on the ground that the victim D (the age of 63) would prevent the victim from attempting to enter the cmate in the back door corridor of the second floor of the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City B market, Gangdong-gu Seoul. The Defendant used the victim’s clothes in his/her hand, and assaulted the victim’s body in several times.
[2019Gohap569] On February 22, 2019, around 20:20, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by openly citing four persons, including the victim F, D, etc., and G, etc. in the above E, prior to E stores located in the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City B market, the Defendant read the victim as the victim’s “Tro 20 years, 20 years, and 20 years of smell,” and “I am saw, and so, I am spat, and spat, spat, and so on.”
2. Judgment [2019 High Court Decision 567]
(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;
(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.
C. The Defendant did not want the punishment after the instant indictment. D. The Defendant expressed his intention not to have the Defendant punished.
Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act [2019 High Court Decision 569]
(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;
(b) An offense subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act.
C. Revocation of complaint: After the instant indictment, the victim expressed his intent to withdraw the complaint.
Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act