1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the court of first instance is not significantly different from that of the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted at the court of first instance is re-examined, the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the plaintiff'

Therefore, the reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is as follows: "The possibility" of the second 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "the possibility"; the first 13 of the 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 7th 2019, except that "the plaintiff appealed against the above judgment and appealed as Seoul Southern District Court 2018No1052, but the appeal was dismissed by the above court on July 18, 2019, and the above judgment becomes final and conclusive at that time," and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first 1. Thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.