beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. D was married to E and the F after E’s death.
The plaintiff is a child born between D and E, and the defendants are children born between D and F.
B. The land listed in Paragraph 1 of the Attached List was owned by E, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on January 8, 1983 under the Plaintiff’s name on February 24, 1995, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on August 23, 2010 under the Defendant B’s name on August 19, 2010.
(No. 22892, received on August 23, 2010) c.
Attached Form
Land listed in paragraph 2 of the list was owned D, and the registration of transfer of ownership was completed on June 1, 200 in the name of the Plaintiff on June 3, 200, and on August 23, 2010, the registration of transfer of ownership was completed on August 19, 2010 in the name of the Defendant B.
(No. 22892) d August 23, 2010.
Attached Form
The land listed in paragraph (3) of the list was owned D, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on June 1, 200 under the name of the Plaintiff on June 3, 200, and on July 2, 2004, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on July 1, 2004 under the name of the Defendant C, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on July 2, 2004 (No. 15522, Jul. 2, 2004), and the registration of ownership transfer was completed under the name of Defendant B on August 23, 2010 under the name of the District Court of Gwangju District, Na District Court (No. 15522, Jul. 23, 2004).
(No. 22893. [Reasons for Recognition] The facts that there is no dispute, Gap evidence No. 1 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings and the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Plaintiff donated each of the lands listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 to Defendant B, or sold the land listed in the separate sheet No. 3 to Defendant C. The Plaintiff did not know, and the Plaintiff and the Defendants voluntarily completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the Defendants. Therefore, each of the Defendants’ respective registrations of ownership transfer as to each