1. The plaintiff's claim against the primary and primary defendant is all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Determination as to the primary primary claim of this case by the plaintiff

가. 이 사건 각각의 청구원인 (1) 주위적 청구원인 : 원고는 주위적 피고로부터 돈을 빌리지 않는 등 원고의 주위적 피고에 대한 채무가 아예 없음에도 불구하고, 주위적 피고와 예비적 피고 사이에 이루어진 이른바 ‘통정한 허위의 의사표시’에 기초하거나 또는 주위적 피고가 예비적 피고의 업무상 배임행위에 적극 가담하여 2015. 1. 12. 별지에 나오는 <어음 공정증서(☞ 갑 2, 이하 편의상 ‘이 사건 집행증서’라고 한다)>가 만들어졌으므로, 민법 제108조, 제103조의 규정에 따라 이 사건 집행증서에 기초한 주위적 피고의 원고에 대한 강제집행은 불허되어야 한다.

(2) Preliminary Claim: If the execution certificate of this case is valid, the plaintiff must pay 35 million won to the main defendant in accordance with the execution certificate of this case. Accordingly, if the plaintiff actually pays the money to the main defendant, the conjunctive defendant shall be liable to pay 35 million won to the plaintiff according to a separate agreement made between the plaintiff and the conjunctive defendant, or the conjunctive defendant shall be liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages equivalent to the amount of damages for the conjunctive defendant's tort committed in the course of the creation of the execution certificate of this case.

B. (1) First, if part of the statements in Gap 4-1, 5, and Eul 9-14 are added to the purport of the entire pleadings, the conjunctive defendant, as the representative director of the plaintiff on May 29, 2014, was awarded a contract for DD Corporation (hereinafter "the instant construction") from the Governor's Road Management Office of Jeollabuk-do, Jeollabuk-do, as the representative director of the plaintiff on the part of the plaintiff, and then, the principal defendant, etc. was awarded a subcontract for the instant construction in a lump sum, and as the so-called "high-term installment" from the primary defendant, KRW 19 million.