logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.06.26 2014고합418
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who actually operates E (ju) in the sixth floor of the D Building in Busan City City, Do.

On April 5, 2011, at the H office operated by the victim G in the F building 602 in the Dong-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Busan Metropolitan City, the Defendant sent to the victim a false statement to the effect that “The ship building certificate stating that the J-J-J-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-S-W-S-S-S-W-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-

However, around January 15, 2010, the above vessel manufactured in the year 1972 (hereinafter “N”) purchased from the Embama-gu Sea of the Republic of Korea by N (hereinafter “N”) as the representative director of N (hereinafter “N”) in the Republic of Korea, for the purpose of dismantling the vessel from the Embama-gu Sea of the Republic of Korea to O to the name of the vessel, and performed the upper shipbuilding work. The above vessel shipbuilding certificate was prepared in the L office located in Kumamo-Samama-si, the Republic of Korea around March 30, 2011 at the L office located in the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea, the Defendant, the representative director of P Co., Ltd., the local individual of Japan, requesting the Defendant to submit Q (hereinafter “T”) to the representative director of the P Co., Ltd. of the Republic of Korea, and prepared a false shipbuilding certificate and a false shipbuilding certificate as the above vessel’s non-building.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim and entering into a contract with the victim to sell the instant vessel in the United Nations on April 20, 201; (b) caused the victim to transfer the vessel to a deposit account in the name of Q as designated by the Defendant in Q in the form of the purchase price of the vessel on April 20, 2011; and (c) caused Q Q to receive the vessel KRW 47 million (in the form of a vessel purchase price, equivalent to KRW 632,207,50).

2. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion of this case.

arrow