logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.04.18 2018고단104
업무방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 11, 2017, the Defendants: (a) 04:30 on the part of November 11, 2017, the Defendant was unable to resist the disturbance, such as that female employees present together with the victim E (n, 47 years of age) in the F amusement shop operated by the Gwangju Mine-gu, without giving the alcohol value to the victim on the ground that they left the match without the speech; and (b) they spawd with the victim by taking a bath, such as “years and police flus.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the victim's main business by force.

2. The Defendants who interfered with the performance of official duties on the ground that: (a) around 04:50 on the same day, the Defendant A paid the alcohol value to the Defendants on the ground that (b) H and security guards belonging to the G District of the Gwangju Mine Police Station G District, and (c) the Defendant A paid the alcohol value to the Defendants at around 04:50 on the same day.

In addition, while taking a bath, this h's h's h's h's h's h's h', the back h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h', the back h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h'h', the head and face were 5-6 h's h's h's h' and the above h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h'

At around 05:00 on the same day, the Defendants were trying to get off and dump off Defendant A from the G District located in theJ of Gwangju Mine, and tried to remove this, and Defendant B contacted his bucks on the bucks of the above H with his bucks, and caused the bucks to the bucks of the above H’s working clothes on the bucks.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ 1.

arrow