Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A, at around 10:30 on July 28, 2017, Defendant A, “2017 high-level 861,” made a public insult of the victim’s victim’s victim’s “as the employees of the D Cheongju Branch Office in the Cheongju Branch Office in the Cheongju District Office in the Cheongju-gu Office in the Cheongju-si Office in the Cheongju-si Office in the Cheongju-si, the employees of the D Cheongju Branch Office in several names, such as B and F, are heard, the employees of the D Cheongju Branch.”

Defendant A of “2018 High 173”, on July 28, 2017, at the Cheongju-si G building, at the location of the fourth floor, at the location of the victim E (V, 47 years old) in a dialogue with H, Defendant A of “Neh-scoping so that there is no water.”

L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.

In doing the bath theory, the victim's chest was flicked once by her finger, and the victim's chest was flicked, and the victim was flicked for about 2 weeks of her flick, and the victim was flicked with a blicker for about 2 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 High Doz. 861]

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Each legal statement of E, B, and F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of each police officer against the defendant A;

1. "2018 Go fixed 173" of the site photographs of the case;

1. Each legal statement in F, E, and B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of each fine concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. Determination as to the assertion of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which means the cost of lawsuit

1. The defendant A cannot perform the work by the victim E at the time of the ruling

“Abstinence,” which occurred on the job, came to the Gabs E by making the Gabstin in the Gabs, and brought a dispute, and the victim et al. wishesed to be “this year” or “the same year” with a small voice that seems to be the victim E, so there is no performance, and the victim E.