logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017.11.09 2017재두5138
위반건축물 이행강제금부과처분취소
Text

The request for retrial is dismissed.

The litigation costs for retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

The grounds for request for retrial shall be examined.

The gist of the grounds for a retrial is that the grounds for a retrial under Article 451 subparag. 9 of the Civil Procedure Act exists in the judgment subject to a retrial, since an argument on the grounds for a final appeal against the judgment by the lower court falls under Article 4(1)2, 4, and 6 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the deliberation should continue to be conducted. However, the judgment subject to a retrial did not render any judgment

However, there is no legitimate ground for retrial that the appeal was dismissed due to the non-examination of the case falling under Article 4 (1) 2, 4, and 6 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal.

In addition, it cannot be said that there is any omission in the judgment subject to a retrial, which dismissed a final appeal due to a lack of deliberation, as a ground for retrial under Article 451 (1) 9 of the Civil Procedure Act (when the judgment was omitted on important matters that may affect the judgment), it cannot be said that

(See Supreme Court Decisions 95Nu176 delivered on February 13, 1996, 2008Da502 delivered on February 12, 2009, etc.). Therefore, the request for retrial is dismissed by the assent of all participating Justices, and the costs of retrial are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow