The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is highly likely to commit the crime of this case, since it runs away without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the injured party by immediately stopping the vehicle, while the injured party D, who is driving the vehicle while driving the vehicle, is faced with the central line in order to overtake the vehicle by the injured party D while driving the vehicle and returning the vehicle to the original line rapidly.

The defendant was unaware of the fact that a traffic accident occurred.

It does not seem that it seriously reflects the crime such as denying it.

There is no agreement between the victims and the defendant, and it is not likely that the defendant is making a good effort to reach an agreement.

The degree of injury suffered by victims is also serious.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, and environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too excessive and is not deemed unfair. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.