logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.11.24 2015가합104112
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant,

A. From March 26, 2011 to Plaintiff A, KRW 33,011,622 and its related thereto:

B. Plaintiff B: 33,074,747.

Reasons

1.The following facts may be acknowledged, either in dispute between the parties, or in full view of the statements in Gap evidence 1 to 4, 9 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1 to 7, and the images in Gap evidence 5 and 6, the results of this court’s entrustment of appraisal to D and the whole purport of the pleadings:

1) The implementation of the Defendant’s urban planning project and the acquisition of the land owned by the Plaintiffs 1) The head of Gangdong-gu, the representative of the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”) shall not be distinguished from

The former Urban Planning Act (repealed by Act No. 6655 of Feb. 4, 2002, hereinafter the same) on July 5, 2000

Pursuant to this, the administrative district was changed to F on July 3, 2007, Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E (F).

hereinafter referred to as “E”

(2) On December 11, 200, the Defendant’s announcement I issued a notice of the determination and cadastral approval of urban planning facilities (road) to implement the “F- once expansion of access roads to housing lots” in G through H group, and the said urban planning projects (hereinafter “instant urban planning projects”) are deemed to be the “instant urban planning projects.”

On April 2, 2001, the Defendant’s announcement of the authorization and announcement of the implementation plan of the instant urban planning project as the project implementer. On May 15, 2001, the Defendant made a public announcement of the approval of the urban planning plan to change the width and size of the road to be installed as the instant urban planning project by the JJ of the Defendant’s announcement, and on May 15, 2001, the authorization and announcement of the alteration of the implementation plan of the instant urban planning project was made to K of the Defendant’s announcement. (2) The Defendant is a land owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant land”) included in the implementation zone of the instant urban planning project as indicated below pursuant to the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Acquisition of Land and Compensation for Loss (repealed by Act No. 6656, Feb. 4, 2002; hereinafter “former Special Act”). The individual land is an acquisition date of land subject to the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the Defendant.

arrow