logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.12 2014고정4387
의료법위반등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are the doctors of F Council members in the fifth floor of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E building.

1. A medical person who has violated the Medical Service Act shall prepare a medical record, etc. and record in detail the matters and opinions concerning the medical practice and sign thereon; and

Defendant

A A A A around September 15, 2011, the Defendant did not sign the Defendant when preparing a medical record after having provided medical treatment to patients G, and after having provided medical treatment to patients G.

In addition, from that time to April 30, 2012, the Defendant provided 14 times in total with medical treatment for the above G or his/her very large couple on behalf of the above G or H, and did not sign the Defendant at least 14 times in total by preparing medical records and failing to sign the Defendant.

B. Defendant B (i) on December 2, 201, the Defendant provided medical treatment to the above member of the Council, on behalf of the patient G, and did not sign the Defendant in the medical record while preparing the medical record.

Dodice Defendant, on December 30, 201, provided medical treatment to the above member of the Council, on behalf of the patient G, and did not sign the Defendant in the medical records while preparing medical records.

2. Fraud;

A. On September 15, 2011, Defendant A claimed KRW 14,500 of the patient himself/herself charges for the above G on the ground that the number of prescribed days of prescription is one week, by taking the examination fees, medicine expenses, etc. into consideration, and by having the victim H, who is his/her father, settle the amount of KRW 14,50 by credit card, thereby obtaining the difference of KRW 6,40.

around September 28, 2011, the Defendant was the National Health Insurance Corporation in consideration of the patient and the time for consultation with respect to the above G that the Defendant gave medical treatment to the above member.

arrow