logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2013.08.30 2012가합6533
청구이의
Text

1. A’s judgment on the claim for construction cost, etc. against the Plaintiff at this Court Decision No. 2009Gahap2807 decided Oct. 20, 2009.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 28, 2004, the Plaintiff, a fire-fighting business, a civil engineering business, a building business, and a landscape trees planting and selling business, was respectively established on October 28, 2004, which was a joint stock company’s dialogue industry on May 18, 2005, a joint stock company on November 13, 2006, a current cancer industry on June 9, 2008, a joint stock company on June 9, 2008, and a mutual name was changed to a modern joint stock company on August 2, 2010.

B. On June 18, 2007, A concluded a provisional attachment order with the Plaintiff on October 20, 2007, among the construction works of the Il-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si-si-si, and completed the construction works on October 20, 2007. However, Nonparty B Co., Ltd (former trade name: C; hereinafter referred to as “B; the same person is H.) did not receive KRW 342,472,610 out of the contract price. The actual operator of the Plaintiff, B, D, E, F, and G Co., Ltd., filed a claim with the Plaintiff for the provisional attachment order of KRW 270,000,000 among the above construction price, KRW 270,472,610 and delay damages against the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff for the provisional attachment order of KRW 360,300,300,300,000,000 for each of the above construction price.

C. The court accepted A’s claim on October 20, 209, and the above judgment (hereinafter “the judgment”) became final and conclusive on November 7, 2009.

On the other hand, the J, who has worked for the management of I, will review the methods of accepting the plaintiff in lieu of the construction cost in the course of collecting the claim for the construction cost against H.

arrow