logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.05.06 2013고정912
상표법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 27,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 150,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In order to import foreign goods, the Defendant reported the name, standard, quantity, and price of goods to the head of the customs office, and knows that a trademark identical or similar to a trademark registered with the Korean Intellectual Property Office is not used for goods similar to the designated goods.

1. The defendant who violated the Customs Act has committed the same year from May 7, 2012

5. 11. 11. When visiting China's Mawn, he purchased a fake name product 298 points in China, such as a fake bag, and a product amounting to KRW 843,175,389, in approximately KRW 10,000,000, and then divided into paper gambling 4 boxes in China, and paid 90,000,000,000 won per Gabn, which was known through the President of the Gabnbnbing House located in China, and transported the product to Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, a five-minute distance from one's domicile.

D, as a separate case for which the Defendant’s cargo was sealed from the non-disfluent logistics company operating above B, collected smuggling with its type E, F, G, H, etc., and loaded 40 feet container 1 loaded with total of 378 boxes, including 4 stuffs that the Defendant was sealed, to Cambodia as if the Defendant were exported from China to Cambodia via Busan port. On June 8, 2012, the aforementioned container was removed from the bonded transportation route on June 15, 2012 through the bonded transportation market at the port of Busan Port and on June 5, 2012, transported 378 feet goods containing 4 stuffs, including 4 stuffs, requested by the Defendant, to be sealed by the Defendant.

As above, on June 15, 2012, the Defendant imported 298 Won, including a domestic fake powder, 8,567,280 won, and 13,473,333 won, without filing a report thereon with the head of the customs office.

2. The Defendant violating the Trademark Act, at the same time and at the same place as that of the preceding paragraph, shall do so in France’s altitude.

arrow