1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A and D shall jointly and severally engage in KRW 100,000,000 and the Defendant A from May 26, 2011.

Basic Facts

피고 A는 자동차운전면허를 받지 않았음에도 2011. 4. 25. 01:30경 창원시 의창구 명서동 소재 명서사거리 앞 편도 3차로 도로에서 F EF 쏘나타 승용차(이하 ‘이 사건 자동차’라고 한다)를 운전하여 2차로를 따라 명곡광장 방면으로부터 창원 서부경찰서 방면으로 시속 약 70km의 속도로 진행함에 있어 전방 및 좌우를 살피지 아니하고 1차로로 차로를 변경한 업무상 과실로, 전방의 2차로에서 진행하고 있던 G SM 7 승용차의 좌측 뒤 범퍼 부분을 이 사건 자동차의 우측 앞 범퍼 부분으로 들이받고, 그 충격으로 이 사건 자동차로 하여금 중앙분리화단을 충격하여 맞은 편 도로로 넘어가게 하면서, 이 사건 자동차에 동승하고 있던 H으로 하여금 위 사고의 충격으로 말미암아 이 사건 자동차 밖으로 튕겨 나와 1차로 바닥에 쓰러지도록 하였다

(2) On the other hand, in the case of the instant vehicle, H had a wide range of frameworks at the lower part of the two frameworks of the first accident, and had a cerebral he contracted down, and such injury was a serious to the extent that it could have been immediately killed in itself. From the same perspective, I driven JNF Hata taxi (hereinafter “instant taxi”) at the rear side of the instant vehicle and proceeded along two lanes, while driving the instant vehicle at the lower part of the instant vehicle, I tried to slowly stop along the instant vehicle with a three-lane change into one lane. On the other hand, H did not find any H which was used in one lane due to the first accident, and sold both H’s ringel, upper part, and upper part of the instant taxi, both parts of the instant vehicle and the instant part of the instant accident and the instant part of the accident were 1 and 200 parts of the accident and the instant part of the accident were 1 and 300 parts of the accident and the instant part of the accident were 20 parts of the instant taxi.

The instant automobiles are subscribed to liability insurance.