A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 20, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution for the violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act in Seoul Northern District Court on April 20, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 28, 2017.

1. On April 29, 2016, the Defendant may complete substantial repair works on the instant commercial building on the part of the victim D’s commercial building located in Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, at a mutually influent coffee shop, and the victim may complete substantial repair works on the part of only four weeks.

“False speech” was made.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to carry out large-scale repair works due to the lack of proper knowledge of the requirements for large-scale repair works. The Defendant, as a person with bad credit, was liable for a large amount of debts including the amount of delinquent taxes up to KRW 40,00,000, and even if the Defendant received money from the injured party, he did not use it for large-scale repair works and was planned to cover the repayment

The defendant was transferred KRW 8,00,000,000 from the damaged person as the contract deposit for large-scale repair works on the same day to the defendant's wife E (companyF) and the same year from around that time.

6. By September 2, 200, a total of 31,400,000 won was remitted under the pretext of large-scale repair works, such as the content Nos. 1 through 5 of the List of Crimes.

2. On September 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at a non-commercial coffee shop near the victim’s commercial building as indicated in the preceding paragraph on September 26, 2016, when the substantial repair work on the preceding paragraph violated the Building Act; and (b) when the removal is carried out upon the order of removal from the Gangnam-gu office, the Defendant would again end the date the removal commenced.

The construction cost may be completed on the face of the State.

“False speech” was made.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to undertake a new construction work, was liable for a large amount of debt as an bad credit, and even if he received money from the injured party, it shall be the large-scale repair work.