The first original judgment shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for fifteen years.

For a period of 10 years, disclosed information on the accused.

Criminal facts

The judgment of the court below on the facts charged against the victim of the crime (where no separate indication is made, the judgment of the court of first instance)

1.(a)

(1) The person guilty in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes in Class G during a class ( quasi-rape, etc. against the disabled)

1.(a)

(2) Innocence of not guilty of sexual intercourse in a wooden market

1.(a)

(3) guilty of sexual intercourse in a dormitory

1.(b)

(1) Defendant guilty as above in relation to H H H H H H H Tym lease

1.(b)

(2) Sexual intercourse at Defendant’s office

1.(c)

(1) Recognizing that I kneeeing in classes with kneeing and violating the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection, etc. of Victims (rape-rape, etc. against the disabled) by changing it to a indecent act against a person with a mental disability (Partial innocence)

1.(c)

(2) An indecent act committed against the knee and knee in the screening of a motion picture in a wooden room.

1. D.

J Innocence not guilty of violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (rape-rape, etc. against Persons with Disabilities) in the class of a wooden room.

1. (e);

Defendant guilty as above in the indecent conduct in K K H HH class classes;

1. (f) guilty as above in an indecent act during L’s class;

1. (f) An indecent act by cleaning a wooden room;

2. The person not guilty of a violation of the Punishment of Intimidation, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapon, etc.) with the Nsaw, among the classes in BS wooden rooms in the judgment of the second instance, the guilty shall be presumed not guilty.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant and the person subject to a request for attachment order (the first instance judgment) (the Defendant and the person subject to a request for the attachment order (the first instance judgment) are deemed to have been prosecuted on the grounds that the instant case was brought up based on an illegal investigation based on leading inquiries and tampling the victims, thereby excluding scientific and reasonable evidence, and thus, the prosecution is null and void due to the abuse of authority. 2) The Defendant and the person subject to a request for attachment order (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”).

The victim G and K continuously put two arms into the winter of the above victims, as they continue to fall within the school hours.