Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A as a landscaping business entity, a person who has been engaged in growing trees in F included in E 166.3km line construction section, and Defendant B agreed to receive profits from gathering pine trees from Defendant A and agreed to receive profits from gathering pine trees from Defendant A and performed work together with Defendant A.

1. Defendant A in violation of the Creation and Management of Forest Resources Act entered into a prior contract with the victim G door, the owner of the relevant mountainous district, in the middle of September 2015, when gathering pine trees in F and doing so within the boundary area permitted by H viewing, Defendant B, despite having entered into a contract with the victim G door, which is the owner of the relevant mountainous district, and perform the digging of pine trees only within the boundary area permitted by H viewing. However, Defendant B, despite the fact that “the pine trees in the boundary area goes beyond

"" means to the effect that Defendant B carried 5 glue 5 glue of pine trees ( approximately approximately 25-30 mm in diameter) owned by the above victim outside the boundary, and carried the 5 tons of pine trees into five tons, which were prepared to prepare the said pine trees.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to gather and steal the original roots of pine trees by using opportunities to exercise the right to extract or gather forest products, and used vehicles to transport stolen goods.

2. On September 2015, Defendants in a forged air defense event conspired with F to remove pine trees extracted from F without permission as referred to in paragraph (1) of the above paragraph from F, Defendant A had the seal of approval for production confirmation, which was possessed at the time, and Defendant B had the seal of approval on the five gs of pine trees indicated in paragraph (1) above, affixed the seal of approval, and thereafter exercised the said seal as if the said buyer had been actually formed by selling it to an irregular enterprise or individual at that time, and then shipping it out to the said buyer.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to use forged H Viewing air.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The defendant A 2, 2.