The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. At the time, the Defendant merely told that he was the oldest, and did not say that he was “I am, I am, I am old, and I am am am son,” as indicated in the facts charged. The Defendant’s words cannot be viewed as the expression of the extinction against the victim.

B. All persons who were at the scene of the instant case cannot be deemed to have a public performance to disseminate the horses of the Defendant as employees of the management office.

C. The Defendant’s words on the part of the victim are merely the horses in the process of pointing out the victim’s mistakes in relation to the fairness of the process of audit and inspection of the outside precision of an apartment. It does not violate social rules.

The offense of insult against the Defendant is established.

Even if the court below's sentence (the fine of 500,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. According to the record on whether the Defendant made a statement as stated in the facts charged, ① the victim made a statement from the investigative agency to the court below that he made the statement as described in the facts charged; ② the victim’s statement is relatively consistent and specific; ② at the time of the trial court, the J stated that at the time of the trial, the Defendant only stated that he “I would am much” as stated in the facts charged. However, I stated in the court below that “I made a statement that “I would like to express the specific contents of the statement, but if I would like to express my opinion at the time of the instant case, I would like to express one another whether two people were interested in,” and H stated in the court below that “I would not memory the specific contents of the statement at the time of the instant case, but would have memory one another,” and that I and H’s statement are credibility consistent with each other, and that I and H’s statement that the Defendant continued to speak in light of such I and H’s statement, and it appears that there exists no credibility of the prosecutor’s office.