Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a game-related business operator who conducts the business of providing Internet computer game facilities under the trade name of "D" in the southanan-gun C.

Game products-related business operators shall observe the hours for admitting juveniles determined at 10 p.m. from 9 a.m. to 10 p.m.

Nevertheless, from around 00:30 on November 7, 2015 to around 03:00 on the same day, the Defendant violated the code of practice of game products-related business operators by allowing juvenile E from the above PC room to use game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F, G, and H;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of a suspect of the police officer regarding I;

1. Each written statement of E and I (the Defendant alleged to the effect that the Defendant had not carried out the game in the instant PC at the time of the instant case, but the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted and examined by the court, i.e., from the first police investigation to the present PC at the time of the instant case to the present court, he/she observed the dispute between I and F during the process of carrying out the game in the instant PC at the time of the instant case, and he/she was assaulted by I during the process of his/her 112, and the Defendant did not confirm his/her identification card at the time. A relatively consistent statement was made to the effect that he/she did not confirm his/her identification card. This is consistent with the statements of I and H investigative agencies at the time of the instant PC, and even if E did not carry out the game in the instant PC, he/she did not carry out

As it appears that there is no particular reason to make a false statement, each of the E's statements are reliable, 2. At the time of witnessing the scene.

In F, G, investigative agencies, and this court stated to the effect that E had observed a game or computer in the instant PC room at the time of the instant case, and H also was charged time to use the instant PC room prior to the dispute between I and F in this court.