Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On June 27, 2014, from around 10:00 on June 27, 2014 to around 10:30 on the same day, the Defendant spits down, without any justifiable reason, on the floor of the above beauty room in the “Dunuseroom” operated by the victim C (hereinafter referred to as “the victim”), who was in the first floor of the commercial building B apartment of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, from around 10:0 to around 10:30 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s beauty room’s business by spiting it on the floor of the above beauty room without the influence of alcohol. The victim’s spaths around 30 minutes of the victim’s beauty room business through force.
2. Intimidation and interference with business on October 30, 2014;
A. At around 14:20 on October 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) discovered the victim, while under the influence of alcohol in the “FE” operated by the victim E (the age of 36) on the first floor of the commercial building of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Seodaemun-gu Seoul (hereinafter “FE”); (b) prevented the victim from doing so; (c) and (d) caused the victim to do so; and (d) said, “I will die and die with a knife with a knife, and knife with a knife, and knife with a knife”; and (d) the victim’s defect to report to the police.
B. The Defendant interfered with business by force, by avoiding disturbance by taking the victim’s desire at the time, place, etc. as mentioned above, and by preventing the police, upon receiving a report, from entering the said marina by no later than 14:50 days from arresting the Defendant as a flagrant offender, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s marina business duties for about 35 minutes by force.
3. On November 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 21:50, at “I restaurant” operated by the victim H in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; and (b) notwithstanding the absence of the intent or ability to pay the value of food, etc., the Defendant completed the payment.