1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s appeal on the principal lawsuit of this case and the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows between the 6th 10th 10th 6th 11th 6th 6th 6th 10th 6th 6th 6th 13th 6th 6th 6th 6th 13th W witness's testimony alone is insufficient to recognize it, and the 11th 19th 19th 1th 19th 3th 4th 201, "the plaintiff already agreed to pay the amount stated in the 21,22,23,28th 20th 3th 20th 3th 200 of the 20th 20th 3th 201th 4th 205 of the 20th 20th 2013. 4th 2010 of the 206th 204th 204th 205 of the 2013th 2013.

2. In addition, the Defendant entered into an agreement with each of the 102 households that the Plaintiff initially planned 34 square meters to change the horizontal type of 37 square meters and to pay the increased additional construction cost of KRW 22,080,000. Therefore, the total construction cost stipulated in the instant contract ought to be KRW 568,080,000 (=existing KRW 22,080,000 added by the existing KRW 546,000), and shall be calculated based on such agreement.