logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.12.05 2017가단204820
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The defendant is subject to KRW 11,153,846, respectively, to the Appointor B, KRW 21,633,39, the plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointor C, D, E, and F.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On December 5, 2016, G driving a H car volume around 12:44, at the end of December 5, 2016, G is proceeding at the speed of 27 km from the rear door of the above apartment to the management office at the speed of 27 km from the rear door of the above apartment, and is proceeding at the speed of 105 km building located on the right side of the vehicle at the above childcare center (hereinafter referred to as “the network”).

2) The Defendant 1 died of cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebrala (hereinafter “instant accident”). The Defendant 1 died on the part of the Defendant 1’s bicycle side.

2) The Appointer B is the deceased’s wife, the Plaintiff (designated Party) and the remaining designated parties, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract regarding the instant vehicle involved.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 6 evidence, Eul 3, 5, 6 through 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. The following facts revealed through the recognition of liability and the above-mentioned facts and the evidence revealed: ① the point of the instant accident appears to be a high-speed intersection installed to induce the reduction of the speed of the vehicle at the intersection by using the high-speed materials, which are the private street intersection without signal lights inside the apartment complex, and are somewhat higher than the surface of the road, using the chilling materials that see the area prior to the intersection, and ② the restricted speed of the point of the instant accident is 20 km a speed higher than that of the road; ② the driver of the Defendant vehicle is driving at the speed of 34 km a speed prior to the entry into the intersection, even though the restricted speed of the point of the instant accident is

A driver who enters a private road with no signal signal, etc., shall perform his/her duty of care in advance due to temporary stop or slowly, etc. ④ Nevertheless, the driver of the defendant vehicle, while driving at a more speed than 27 km rate without performing his/her duty of care in advance, is running the same as a bicycle.

arrow