Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing car.

On March 16, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car on March 17:35, 2013, and led to the passage of one-lane road in front of the Japanese oil station located in the Geumju-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-do, to the front right-side bank.

In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents, such as safe driving along the vehicle line, by accurately manipulating the front line and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the steering system of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the Defendant was driving by the victim C (the age of 56) who was driving normally in the opposite lane, and received the front part of the left-hand part of the D-to-hand sports vehicle as the front-hand part of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as minculization of flavers to the right side, which requires approximately 10 weeks of treatment, from the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of E and C;

1. A written statement;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Each on-site photograph and the actual survey report;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal investigation;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to Relevant Acts concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The defendant with reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is driving under the influence of alcohol.

In light of the fact that the central line is invaded and causes the traffic accident in this case, the victim's degree of injury is heavy, the agreement is not reached, and the small drinking drinking water is rapidly drinking for the purpose of making it difficult to measure drinking water immediately after the accident.