Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a XG car by borrowing B.

1. On January 5, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driving the said vehicle as a duty of around 18:25, and driving the said vehicle at around 18:25, and changing the three-lanes from the four-lanes ahead of the DNN in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu into the two-lanes where the two-lanes flowed from the four-lane distance on the street in the street of the Nowon-gu.

In this case, there was a duty of care to inform the direction change in advance to the hand, direction, etc., and to change the lanes safely by taking into account the situation of traffic before, after, after, and after the direction.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and has been driving by the victim E (19 years) who was in transit along the same direction two lanes due to the negligence of changing the two lanes in the same direction.

F 포터 화물차 우측 앞부분을 피고인 차량 좌측면 부로 들이받았고, 그 충격으로 피해 포터 차량이 좌측으로 튕기면서 반대편 1 차로에서 신호 대기 중이 던 피해자 G(43 세) 이 운전하던

H collisions with the front of the cargo vehicle.

Thus, the defendant suffered the injury of the victim E, such as knee knee knee knee kne kne kne kne kne knee, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment by negligence in the above occupational negligence.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, such as the above “1”, destroyed the repair cost of approximately KRW 6,910,00, such as the F Poter Cargo in front of the damaged vehicle, and approximately KRW 7,446,00, such as the Habter Cargo in front of the damaged vehicle and KRW 7,446,00.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, in spite of the fact that the Defendant was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle, other than the motor vehicles prescribed by the Presidential Decree, on the road, which is not covered by mandatory insurance, the Defendant operated Bchip XG motor vehicles at the location of the said accident without mandatory insurance.