A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on the 3rd apartment of Sungwon-gu, Sungwon-gu, Sungwon-gu, Sungwon-si; (b) around 23:15, the Defendant: (c) indicated the facts charged of the charge of the above D’s chest in the charge of the charge of the charge of the violation of the duty to make a statement that the Defendant would damage another person’s passenger car license plate, etc. while under the influence of alcohol; and (d) stated D’s slope belonging to the Changwon-gu Police Station, Changwon-gu, who was called by the Defendant after receiving 112 a report that the Defendant would damage another person’s car license plate, etc., under the influence of alcohol, ask the Defendant personal information; and (d) made the call to the Defendant, and (e) made the call to the Defendant, and recognized it as the Defendant

In this regard, violence was committed on a one-time basis, such as the threshold of the above D.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of report 112 by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. 【Defense Counsel’s photograph and investigation report (Evidence video-related)” asserts that the Defendant’s grandchildren, etc., upon the police officer’s blicking of the Defendant’s grandchildren and flicking of the Defendant, did not commit any act as indicated in its reasoning. According to the evidence examined earlier, the Defendant’s blicking or flicking of the police officer’s chests, etc., while blicking about 20 to 30 minutes to the police officers on duty, and flicking of the police officer’s chests, etc., the police officer’s remaining blicking of the Defendant so that the police officer could return to the Defendant, but the Defendant was forced to move the Defendant to the police officer following the police officer’s blicking of the Defendant’s blicking of the Defendant’s blickness, etc., the Defendant’s act cannot be evaluated as passively applied to the extent of the police officer’s blicking of the statute.

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime