logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.11.22 2018노1969
공무집행방해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the police officer E has not pushed his chest as stated in the facts charged at the time of the instant case.

In addition, although the defendant committed an act of putting the hand and arms of police officers, it constitutes a legitimate defense since it was an act to resist the illegal arrest of the defendant himself/herself.

Although the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged, there is an error of misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles.

2. 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 이 사건 당시 현장에 출동한 경찰관이 체포 당시의 상황을 촬영한 현장 채 증자료의 영상에 의하면, 피고인은 경찰관들이 친구인 I을 폭행죄의 현행범으로 체포하여 연행하려는 과정에서 경찰관들이 엘리베이터를 타고 위층으로 올라가려는 것을 저지하려고 경찰관들을 막고 팔을 뿌리치는 등 몸싸움을 하며 엘리베이터 문이 닫히지 않도록 막는 행위를 하는 모습이 확인되는 점, ② 당시 출동한 경찰관 E는 I을 현행범으로 체포하기 위하여 인적 사항을 물어보던 중에 피고인이 옆에서 “ 뭘 이런 것을 체포하려고 하느냐,

The police officers called "I not separate," sent their chest one time, arrested I as a flagrant offender, and arrested I while continuing to drive on the earth for about five minutes from that time, and prevented I from driving on the earth by putting I with his hand and arms.

The statement, ③ the manager of the entertainment station, which is the site of this case, was present, and the F.N. witnessing the situation at that time, and the police officer attempted to arrest and conduct I, and the defendant was asked to stop with the police officer's arms.

In full view of the facts stated in the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant, like E, arrested the friendship I by police officers including E as flagrant offenders.

arrow