The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although the Defendant had a knife at the time of the instant case, but did not have any knife the victim’s knife by directly knife, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby causing the Defendant to inflict knife the victim’s right knife as indicated in the instant facts charged.

B. The lower court’s imprisonment (ten months of imprisonment) against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On March 19, 2020, at around 02:45 on March 19, 202, the Defendant asserted that the Defendant had the same purport as the grounds for appeal in the judgment of the court below. The court below rejected the Defendant’s allegation that, in light of the following facts and circumstances as indicated in the reasoning of the court below, the Defendant sent the Victim B (Nam, 20 years old), who was in possession of “the knife-knife-knife-kack (10cm in knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knif-k-knif-k-k-knif.

In addition to the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below in light of the facts and circumstances that the court below decided as appropriate, the decision of the court below that the defendant injured the victim's right knife as stated in the facts charged of this case is just, and there is no error of law of misunderstanding of facts as alleged by the defendant.

Therefore, it is true.