logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.04.18 2018노559
특수상해등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, there was no fact that the Defendant misunderstanding the victim’s timber was dried (Article 1(1) of the facts charged in this case), and even though the Defendant satise the knife with his own knife for self-harm, there was no fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim with a knife (Article 2 of the facts charged in this case). Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts charged in this case, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment, No. 1, No. 2) that is unfair in sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On December 5, 2017, the lower court found the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined at the lower court’s determination as to the assertion of factual mistake: (i) the victim prepared from the Defendant on December 5, 2017 a written statement from the police immediately after the injury was inflicted upon the Defendant due to the crime listed in paragraph (2) of the instant facts charged; (ii) the Defendant’s knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.

In other words, the part of the victim's ship and the part part of the right blue was laid down, and even before two to three days, the part of the victim was cut down by the blue with the blue in the Mour.

Specifically, at the time of the statement, the elbow of beer victim's elbow is being taken by a knife knife knife, and the victim stated on December 21, 2017 that in the currency with the prosecution investigator on December 21, 2017, the defendant's elbane was mixed with several colors in the body-shaped shape. This is consistent with the defendant's elbane taken by the police, and the defendant appears to have been defended by the defendant because the knife was defended by the defendant, and the victim later stated in the court of the court of the original trial that the elbow occurred.

arrow