Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. As to the summary of the reasons for appeal against the defendant, the defendant asserts that the defendant's imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that it is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: (a) the defendant committed the crime against the victim E at the end of September 2013, but led to the confession of all the crimes, such as denying the crime at the court below, confession, etc. at the court below; (b) the defendant was committed to prepare living expenses while the defendant suffered economic difficulties; and (c) there was a record of criminal punishment on several occasions, such as the defendant's criminal records having been sentenced to suspended sentence due to the use of computers, etc., such as the crime of this case; and (d) the defendant was employed as an employee at a singing room for the purpose of the crime; and (e) embezzled the amount of money of customers through several times in accordance with the plan to commit the crime of this case, and embezzled the amount of money of an automatic cash payment amount of KRW 11 million in total,00,000,000 in consideration of the background, method, and result, etc. of the crime of this case; and (e) there was no effort to recover from damage; and (e) other circumstances of sentencing that are too heavy or unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.