All appeals by the prosecutor and the defendant are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (two months of imprisonment, forty hours of an order to attend a course, five years of an employment restriction order, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination is a favorable condition for the following: (a) the Defendant was unable to have a full care under the condition that he was responsible for living at the time when he was living; (b) her mother was dead before her mother was faced with difficulties in forming a social relationship; (c) the Defendant was living in the company in good faith for 16 years; and (d) the Defendant was living in the company.

However, the defendant was suspended from indictment on October 28, 2015 for the same crime, and was sentenced to six months of imprisonment on May 16, 2019 and two years of suspended execution (determined on May 24, 2019) on May 16, 2019, and immediately thereafter, the defendant is highly likely to be subject to criticism by committing each of the of the instant crimes, and the body of women, including workplace rent, is taken several images, and the crime is not good.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions expressed in the pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and circumstances before and after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is adequate and cannot be deemed to be too heavy or unhued and so it goes beyond the reasonable scope of discretion.

3. Conclusion Prosecutor and Defendant’s appeal are all dismissed for lack of grounds.