(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.02.18 2019고정2933

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.02.18 2019고정2933

폭행

Text

Defendant

The sentence for B shall be suspended.

Of the facts charged in this case, the prosecution against Defendant A is dismissed.

Reasons

The criminal facts (defendant B) around 08:20 on July 19, 2019, around 08:20, Defendant B inflicted injury on the victim A (the victim) and the victim A (the victim, the 25 years of age, the female) with respect to the appraisal he accumulated while working at the coffee store in Seocho-gu Seoul, on one occasion, the victim et al. al. al. with his head as a drinking, knife his head with his knife and sweet his face with his knife, and with his knife with his knife, the victim's face and kick with his knife with his knife that the victim would need three-way treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to A by the police;

1. A's accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (on-site closed-circuit television analysis);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Punishment of suspended sentence under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act: fine of 1,00,000,000 won for a fine of 1,000,000 won for a day: The motive and background of the instant crime, and agreement between Defendant B and the victim;

(1) Of the facts charged in this case, Defendant B dismissed the prosecution (i.e., the first offender who had not been prior to the instant case) (i.e., the Defendant A), around 08:20 on July 19, 2019, Defendant A committed an assault to the victim B and the victim, who had a dispute about the appraisal he accumulated in the coffee store in Seocho-gu Seoul, on the part of the victim B, and during that period, the victim B and the victim had a face and sponsed with the face of the face of the victim, such as the face-to-face face-to-face face damages, gambling, spons, etc., the victim’s hair was sponsed with the head of the victim and sponsed with the head of the victim, the victim’s head was spicked once with his head, the victim was sponsed once on the right side of the bridge, and the victim was sponsed once on the spons.

I examine this point.

The above act of the defendant falls under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act.

참조조문

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2014.05.21 2013고단5893

-부산지방법원 2014.01.06 2013고정937

-대구지방법원 2019.10.24 2019고정741

-의정부지방법원 2012.12.17 2012고정2799

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.02.14 2012고정793