Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B was on October 29, 2012, at around 20:10, the office of the Defendant was located in Busan Northern-gu E, Busan, North Korea.

At the same time, the victim A(57 years of age) found the entrance to receive electricity and opened the entrance in front of the entrance, and the victim's face was used as violence, such as drinking twice the victim's face due to drinking, and the wheels to enter the hand-to-be by hand, on the ground that it was not the case that the victim A(57 years of age) was in front of the entrance.

In this respect, the victim A suffered damage to the inner part that needs to be treated for a period of two weeks, such as the impairment of the inner part, gymnasium, and the medical examination.

2. The Defendant, like the preceding paragraph, committed assault, such as the victim B (here, 48 years of age)’s face at drinking and quih-to-saw quih, etc., and exercised violence, such as flaging the victim’s head debt, flaging the victim’s head debt at hand, flaging the left-hand shoulder by drinking.

In this respect, the victim B suffered from the 10-day medical treatment of the 10-day medical treatment account, the 10-day medical treatment account, the 2 government account account account, and the 10-day medical care account.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Each legal statement of witness B and G;

1. The injury diagnosis report (B) and the inquiry inquiry report (Defendant B);

1. A’s legal statement;

1. The suspect A’s bodily injury image photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the General Medical Certificate (A);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendants’ assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendants asserts to the effect that their act constitutes self-defense, as it aims to passively oppose each other’s assault from the other party.

However, according to the evidence adopted and examined by this court, the defendants started physical fighting without raising any arbitr while giving and receiving an excessive horse due to the payment of electricity.