Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant from March 13, 2014 to the same year.

6. From 25. 25. (No. 25. of the same month’s written indictment) up to 01:00, the operator operated a marina shop with the trade name “D” under subparagraph 402 of Article 402 of the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building C in Dobong-gu, and had five partitions, a camera, a waiting room, and a water surface room with a shower size of about 40 square meters, and employed female employees, such as E and F, under the condition that 60,000 won shall be paid out of 10,000 won or 110,000 won received from customers, on June 24, 2014, and had the above E find the above business place and make them do a similar act with male customers on the name of misstatement and one-time comparison with the above female sexual traffic, and had them see the similarity by taking advantage of or harming the sexual organ of male customers in return for payment.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an act of arranging sexual traffic through the above method during the above period.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspects of E or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of a fine, comprehensively, by Articles 19 and 19 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act, Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. In full view of all the circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not constitute a criminal offense and reflects the Defendant’s reason for sentencing, the operating period does not expire, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship