Text
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
Reasons
1. No person who outlines the facts charged shall interfere with the preparation, posting, posting, or installation of posters, placards, or other propaganda facilities, or damage or scrap them without justifiable grounds;
A. On April 22, 201, around 09:01, the Defendant damaged the election poster by putting the 19th presidential election poster attached to the Gu Park pent-ro No. 1345, a 5-gil, a citizen park pent-ro, in hand, and continuously paying the poster attached with the knife, and then leaving the poster at the lower end of the stairs’s entrance.
B. On April 23, 2017, the Defendant removed posters No. 1 through No. 5 from among the 19th presidential election posters posted at the same place as the above paragraph (a) around April 23, 2017, and damaged them by means of inside.
As a result, the Defendant damaged the poster for election without any justifiable reason on two occasions.
2. Judgment on the defendant's mental or physical loss
A. Under Article 10(1) of the premised legal doctrine, a person who has mental or physical loss means a person who lacks the ability to discern things from things, i.e., a person who lacks the ability to reasonably distinguish things from things, or lacks the ability to control his or her act by determining whether he or she has a capacity to distinguish things from things, i.e., a person who has a capacity to distinguish things from things, or a person who lacks the ability to control his or her act by determining whether he or she has a capacity to distinguish things, and a person who is not a person who
The above physical change ability and decision-making ability are related to the ability or significance of judgment, and do not necessarily coincide with the perception ability or memory ability of fact (see Supreme Court Decision 90Do1328, Aug. 14, 1990, etc.). Moreover, the determination of whether or not a mental or physical disorder prescribed in Article 10 of the Criminal Act exists and degree of the mental or physical disorder does not necessarily necessarily belong to the opinion of a specialized appraiser as a legal judgment, and the type and degree of mental illness, motive and background of the crime, means and manner of the crime, the defendant's behavior before and after the crime, and degree of reflection.