logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.09.03 2015고단848
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 30, 2015, the Defendant driven a bschton car on May 23:45, 2015, and came to turn to the left at the left, one-lane of the two-lanes in the direction of the Chump in the central market.

At that time, there is a signal apparatus indicating the signal apparatus and the traffic safety facilities, so the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to proceed with the signal apparatus and prevent the accident from spreading.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused injury to the victim C(the age of 47) who was driven by the victim C(the age of 47) who was driven by the straight signal from the right-hand signal due to occupational negligence, in violation of the right-hand turn signal, by taking the front part of the CA110E part of the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle and taking approximately eight weeks of medical treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared by C concerning traffic accidents;

1. Reports on traffic accidents and reports on occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing criteria are not applied since the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is sentenced to a fine for the reason of sentencing.

In full view of the fact that the defendant's negligence in violation of the signal caused a traffic accident involving the driver's mispercing of the victim's driving, the degree of injury suffered by the victim is significant, but the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance has been agreed with the victim, the defendant has no criminal history exceeding the fine, and there is no criminal history against the defendant's mistake, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined.

arrow