Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 11, 2013, at around 11:40, the Defendant driven a wing 125CC 125, and driven a two-lane road on the YY Hayang-gu Parkyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, the Defendant proceeded along a one-lane road on the side of the Hayang-gu, Annyang-gu.

There are signals indicating the signal apparatus and traffic safety facilities, so the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to stop the accident by driving with the signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the victim C(22 years of age) to have the right side part of the off-to-faced passenger vehicle driven by the victim C(22 years of age) under the direct margin signals due to occupational negligence, which caused a red signal in violation of the signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the car to cover approximately KRW 2,738,435 of the repair cost by occupational negligence as above.

2. The Defendant: (a) was the owner of the above Oral Ba and the owner of the above Oral Ba, who was operating a motor vehicle on his behalf; and (b) operated the above Oral Ba, which was not covered by liability insurance from the insane of the date of 2012 to December 11, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared by C concerning traffic accidents;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Registers of driver's licenses (20 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 46 (2) and 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and selection of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The fact that the defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is recognized as having obtained a vehicle driven by the victim, but this is due to the defendant's negligence in violation of the signal, and damage to the victim.