1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

1. The reasons why a party member of the court of first instance shall explain this case are as follows: (a) a certain portion of the remaining parts except the conclusion among the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance shall be used as stated in paragraph (2) below; and (b) the remaining part of the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance except for the rejection of documentary evidence submitted by the plaintiff and the defendant at the court of first instance is the same as that of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus,

2. Parts to be dried;

A. The sum of the unpaid allowances of the first instance court No. 21 to No. 20 is the same as the sum of allowances on the same Table (i.e., the sum of the unpaid allowances of each of the plaintiffs after June 2007, in which the plaintiffs are claiming (i.e., the sum of the amounts of the respective allowances of each of the plaintiffs after June 2007). (The sum of the amounts stated in the above table is the sum of the amounts calculated by adding the balance of the remaining allowances of each of the instant cases except the annual allowance to each of the monthly payments). The sum of the "amount of the unpaid allowances" in the same table = the sum of the allowances after June 2007 in the same table = the sum after June 2007 (the sum of the unpaid allowances is the sum of the amounts calculated by adding the difference of the unpaid allowances of each of the instant cases, excluding the unpaid allowances of each

b. The phrase “each year, 1, 3, 7, and 10” in Part 9 of the first instance court Decision No. 25 shall be deemed to read “each year, 1, 4, 7, 10 months”.

April 2008 08/1 606,720 607,720 156,736 08/208/3

(c) Attached Form 64 of the judgment of the first instance.

5. Of the aggregate table of the total amount of unpaid bonuses by the plaintiff, 1,062,07 Eul 1,062,007 Eul 08/10 00 April 2008 08/208/208/3 bonus 905,271 .05,271 . Of the aggregate table of the total amount of unpaid bonuses by the plaintiff (as seen in the above basic facts, a middle-aged person shall not be paid a bonus for the quarter corresponding to the date of his/her membership);

3. As seen in the statement on “the service period table by plaintiff”, in the case of the selected party B, he did not enter February 4, 2008 and paid the bonus for April 2008. Thus, the above list is above.