beta
Text
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff A KRW 3,00,000 for each of the 119,116,881 won, the plaintiff B, and C, and KRW 1,00,00 for each of the plaintiff D, and this shall apply.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition showed that, around 08:10 on May 12, 2010, E driving a F typ vehicle, driving the back road located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the side of H real estate along the Imam to the right-hand side of H real estate, and the Plaintiff A was shocked into the front part of the above vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”), and thereby, Plaintiff A suffered injury, such as the thalthing of the thrath, the thalth of the thalth of the thalth of the thalth, the thalth of the thalth of the thalth, the thalth of the thalth of the thal
Plaintiff
B The father of the Plaintiff A, the mother of the Plaintiff C, and the Plaintiff D are the shapes of the Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the foregoing vehicle driven by the Plaintiff E.
[Evidence] Evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Evidence Nos. 4-1 to 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the facts acknowledged as above, since E was driving the above vehicle while causing the instant accident and thereby causing injury to the Plaintiff, the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiffs for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the instant accident.
Although the Defendant asserts that there was no causal link between the Plaintiff’s lower half-hand paralysis and the instant accident, according to the Plaintiff’s evidence 8-2 (the result of the physical appraisal commission in the criminal trial against E), the court of Indonesian Hospital J of Dolsung University: (a) after the instant accident occurred, Plaintiff A’s lower half-halfer macy and stress; (b) it can be deemed that Plaintiff A’s lower half-halfer macy did not result from damage to Nonparty A’s symptoms, but from a psychological factor; (c) it was not related to the instant accident; and (d) it can be acknowledged that Plaintiff A’s secondly stress disorder was related to the instant accident; and (e) it shows that Plaintiff A’s lower half-halfer macy symptoms after the instant accident occurred; and (e) Plaintiff A’s lower half-halfer Macy and Manean was due to any mental injury, or a mental disorder.