1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 1, 2012, the Plaintiff, who is an employee engaged in the lumbering business, received a medical care until December 13, 2013, with the injury to the right side of 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 cryp cryp, the upper part of the upper part of the cryp, the upper part of the cryp, the upper part of the cryp, the upper part of the cryp, the upper part of the cryp, the upper part of the cryp, the upper part of the cryp, the upper part of the cryp, the upper part of the cryp, the upper part of the cryp, the upper part of the cryp, the upper part of the cryp, the upper part of the cryp, and the cryp stress disorder.

B. On November 18, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for additional medical care and additional injury to “ex post facto stress disorder (personal disorder; hereinafter “the instant additional injury”). However, the Defendant rendered a disposition of additional medical care and additional injury to the Plaintiff on February 24, 2015, based on a medical opinion to the effect that “Ex post facto stress disorder is not particularly worse than the treatment point, and there is no evidence for brain damage in the two parts of video materials, and there is no additional injury.”

(2) In the case of a request for reexamination of the above disposition, the disposition of non-approval of additional medical care was revoked, and thus, the disposition of non-approval of additional medical care was only referred to as "the disposition of this case"). 【The ground for recognition' is not disputed, each entry in the evidence Nos. 1 and 3, and the purport

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. If the Plaintiff alleged that the symptoms of this case have deteriorated due to the accident of this case, such as the Plaintiff’s aggressive and extreme behavior, even though the additional disease of this case can be deemed to have occurred, the disposition of this case which did not approve the additional disease of this case should be revoked as it is unlawful.

나. 관계 법령 ▣ 산업재해보상보험법 제49조(추가상병 요양급여의 신청) 업무상의 재해로 요양 중인 근로자는 다음 각 호의 어느 하나에 해당하는 경우에는 그 부상...