logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.04.21 2015가단237575
건물명도
Text

1. The plaintiff

A. Defendant A’s real estate listed in the attached Form 1 list;

B. Defendant B shall be listed in the attached Table 2.

Reasons

1. Claims against the defendant A and B

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(However, only part of the defendant A and B).

applicable provisions of Acts: Articles 150(3) and 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act (Judgment of deemed as independent)

2. As seen in the part as to Defendant C among the reasons for the claim as indicated in the separate sheet against Defendant C, the Plaintiff leased the lease term to Defendant C from December 1, 2012 to November 30, 2014; the lease deposit is KRW 2,648,00; and the monthly rent is KRW 54,350; Defendant C has leased the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 3; Defendant C has delayed the payment of rent and management expenses for three months from July 2015 to September 2015; and the said delayed payment of additional deposit and additional deposit and renewal of the lease contract are without concluding a renewal contract, and the failure to pay additional deposit after the termination of the lease term constitutes grounds for termination and permanent rental housing management standards as determined at the time of the said lease; and the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to terminate the lease constitutes grounds for termination between the parties to the instant contract and the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to the termination thereof is not subject to dispute.

According to the above facts of recognition, the above lease contract on real estate listed in the attached Table 3 attached to the plaintiff and defendant C was lawfully terminated.

As such, Defendant C is obligated to deliver to the Plaintiff the real estate stated in attached Form 3 as the restoration upon termination of the lease agreement.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is justified.

arrow