logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2017.09.27 2017고단149
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant against B was aware of the Victim B’s Work at the Busan National Agricultural Branch Office, the Busan National Agricultural Cooperative of the Republic of Korea around October 30, 2009, and the Defendant had been aware of the fact that “the funds are needed to purchase pine trees.”

The phrase “I wish to pay the money in return for a loan of money” was false.

However, the Defendant had no particular property at the time, and was in bad credit standing due to lack of certain income. Even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party, it was thought that he would use part of the money for gambling, and there was no idea to purchase pine trees in full. Therefore, even if he borrowed money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant paid KRW 3,00,000 from the injured party to the post office account under the name of the Defendant on the same day on the same day, and from then on June 9, 2010, the Defendant deposited KRW 62,80,000 in total from the injured party under the same name 28 times in total, such as the list of crimes in the annexed crime list.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On October 28, 2015, the Defendant against E: (a) at the lending business office of F commercial stores 155-2, Jinju-si, Jinju-si; (b) at the victim E with intellectual disability 3, known to the NNN line, the Defendant sold a mobile phone in the name of the NNggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggging

He said that he would not suffer damage.

However, in fact, the Defendant had no particular assets at the time and had no fixed income, and therefore had the victim open the mobile device through the opening of the mobile device and sold it in high order and did not have the intent or ability to pay the installments and the charges of the mobile device even if the Defendant received the payment.

Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.

arrow