logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2017.11.08 2017고단1029
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] On November 6, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny at the Suwon Giwon and 2 years of suspended execution, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 14th of the same month.

[Criminal facts]

1. On July 16, 2015, even if the Defendant borrowed money from a female-friendly job offering victim B, he/she was thought to consume it as materials value or as wages, and was in an excessive credit condition. Ultimately, he/she applied for personal rehabilitation to the Suwon District Court on April 10, 2015, prior to the lending of money from the victimized party, and even if he/she borrowed money from the victimized party, he/she did not have an intention or ability to pay it normally.

Nevertheless, on July 2015, the Defendant called the victim at a place where the police officer was not a police officer in early July 2015 and borrowed money to receive a loan because there is no money to do so. The loan will be repaid from time to time.

“In the end, the Defendant did not notify the fact that the Defendant had already applied for the individual rehabilitation because of the excessive debt as above, and it received KRW 10 million from the injured party on the 16th of the same month via the corporate bank account (Account Number: C) in the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On November 6, 2015, even if the Defendant borrowed money from a female-friendly job offering victim B, he/she was thought to consume it as materials value or as wages, and was in an excessive credit condition. Ultimately, he/she applied for personal rehabilitation to the Suwon District Court on April 10, 2015, prior to the lending of money from the victimized party, and even if he/she borrowed money from the victimized party, he/she did not have an intention or ability to pay it normally.

Nevertheless, on October 2015, the defendant called the victim at a place where the horse is in a fire, and "the value of materials should be given."

arrow