logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.04.11 2017고단4836
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 2017, the Defendant expressed that “The victim D (27 years of age) who was confined together in the Daejeon Prison, which is located in the Daesung-gu U.S. Woo-dong C room in the Daejeon War, expressed that “The victim D (27 years of age) was immediately inside the opening,” on the ground that the victim D (27 years of age) in the two-dong C room in the Daejeon Daejeon Prison cannot be boomed, and caused the victim’s injury on the number of days of treatment incurred on the left side buckbucks to the victim twice.”

2. At around 08:00 on October 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the heading of the Dong Dong Dong-dong, Daejeon Daejeon Prison, the Defendant, on the ground that the above victim’s behavior was not in mind; (b) and (c) the victim’s body was frightened and seated; (d) but he was frightened, the victim’s coconium was fright at one time; and (e) the victim’s right side part was frightened on the right side of the entrance; and (e) the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim on the number of days of treatment that was incurred on the right side.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Attachment to register of obligation of victims);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 of the same Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is doubtful as to whether the instant crime is committed in the course of probation, while being tried again in violent cases, as the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and whether the instant crime is committed seriously against his/her behavior.

However, in full view of all of the sentencing data of this case, the crime of this case is to be punished by a fine, including the fact that the victim has induced, agreed with the victim, and that the sentence has already become final and conclusive due to a separate crime, and that it would have been expected that a long-term confinement life will be achieved as a result of the suspension of execution.

arrow