A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Punishment of the crime

around June 13, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A victim C, who requested the Defendant to meology in front of the Sungnam-si B apartment at Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, requested the Defendant to purchase the meology, may cause the meology construction at a reduced cost of 50% when purchasing the rophone at KRW 5 million.”

However, it was true that Dpromophones did not exist, even if the victim received money from the victim, it was thought that they will be used to repay other debts, and there was no intention or ability to allow the interior work at a discounted cost of 50%.

The defendant was transferred from the victim to the account of community credit cooperatives (Account Number: E) in the name of the defendant on the same day under the name of the victim as the purchase of a Dcphone.

Accordingly, from February 24, 2017 to June 30, 2017, the Defendant deceptioned victims by the same method nine times in total, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, and acquired 46.5 million won in total.

"2018 Highest 467"

1. On February 2, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim H of the F apartment G from the Seocho-gu F apartment G during the Seocho-gu, 2017, stating, “If you purchase discount coophones sold in D at KRW 3 million per page, they will sell it to other customers at KRW 4 million.”

However, there was no intention or ability to pay coophone profits even if the victim receives money from the victim because the coophone does not exist.

On February 8, 2017, the Defendant received KRW 15 million from the victim to the Defendant’s account.

2. On March 8, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim under the preceding paragraph, stating, “The Defendant, by telephone, shall pay 50% of the profits accrued from the sale of the real estate after he purchased the previous house at the time of Ansan-do, with the electric house Jho-gu, and then jointly purchased it.”

However, the defendant is true.