Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving freight B.

At around 15:20 on August 19, 1997, the Defendant driven the said vehicle without a driver’s license, and proceeded bypassing about 50 kilometers from the sex exchange to the speed of 50 kilometers from the same Eup/Myeon to the sex exchange rate of 15:0 on August 19, 197.

However, since there is a four-distance intersection, a person engaged in driving service is driving at a rate of 4 meters from the side of the rate of interest that he/she neglected his/her duty of care to reduce speed and accurately operate and prevent accidents by operating the steering direction and brakes accurately, but proceeds from the side of the rate of interest that he/she is negligent in neglecting the duty of care to prevent accidents.

The parts of the victim C(Y, 28 years old)'s D car driving, which were stopped in the signal signal atmosphere, were placed in front of the left side and the left side side side side of the victim's D car, and got the victim to suffer the gates and gates that require approximately two weeks of treatment, and at the same time, they did not take necessary measures such as providing relief to the victim by immediately stopping the vehicle.

Judgment

According to Article 249(2) of the former Criminal Procedure Act (amended by Act No. 8730 of Dec. 21, 2007), the statute of limitations shall be deemed to have expired after the lapse of 15 years from the time the public prosecution was instituted without confirmation of judgment. The crime of this case is obvious that 15 years have elapsed without confirmation of judgment from March 24, 1998.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute the completion of the statute of limitations, and thus, a judgment of acquittal is rendered pursuant to Article 326 subparagraph 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act.