1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following two cases. Thus, the court's explanation concerning this case shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On the 4th 15th th 15th th 15th 1 of the first instance court's decision which re-written or added the first instance court's decision, "if it is original impossible, it shall be null and void." The 4th ambs shall be deemed null and void due to original impossibility, and if the price was indicated in the independent obstruction list and the price was calculated, and the decision of expropriation was not obtained, it shall be deemed possible, and even if there was no such part, it shall be deemed that the instant compensation agreement was made on the remainder, and remaining parts, such as boness, walls, excreta, wastewater, etc., which are the subject of the compensation agreement by the Defendant shall not be deemed to be a stable or an obstacle subject to

The 6th 9th 9th am "," and it shall be re-established as "as it does not interfere with the above recognition only with the statement of Eul evidence 12."

At the bottom of the 6th parallels “only 4 to 6 evidence” and “only 4 to 6, 8 through 11, and 19 evidence in the light of the entry of evidence No. 16 and the testimony of witness G”.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is consistent with this conclusion, and the defendants' appeal is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit.