logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2012.10.11 2012고단3938
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 18, 1993, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 10 months in the Incheon District Court for larceny, etc.; on February 26, 1996, the same court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 10 months in the course of larceny, etc.; on November 11, 1997, the same court was sentenced to a imprisonment of 1 year and 6 months in the course of violating the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes Act; on April 21, 2000, the same court was sentenced to a imprisonment of 1 year and 6 months in the course of violating the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes Act; on January 29, 2004, 2 years in the same court was sentenced to a prison term of 3 years in the Suwon District Court for a violation of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes Act; on October 15, 2009, the defendant completed the sentence after being sentenced to a imprisonment of 3 years in the same court.

At around 10:30 on August 25, 2012, the Defendant discovered that there was a head door of the DNA Lone Star vehicle, which was set up in front of the new construction site of Suwon-si C, Suwon-si.

The Defendant, through the open door of the above vehicle, carried 1,280,000 won in total of the market price of 1,280,000 won in the market price of the victim E, which is equivalent to 1,00,000 won in cash, from the part of the victim E, which was placed in the front line of the above vehicle, and carried 1,280,000 won in the market price of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Photographs of damaged articles;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, etc. and inquiry reports, investigation reports (former records, court rulings, etc.);

1. Habituality of the judgment: it shall be deemed that each crime history, method of crime, and release was committed for a long time as stated in the judgment, and that the crime was committed.

arrow