beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2] On February 10, 1975, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of eight months for larceny in the Daejeon District Court red support, and two years for habitual larceny in the same court on June 3, 1976; on October 13, 1982, the court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months for habitual larceny; on August 20, 1993, the Incheon District Court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for one year for larceny, etc.; on January 20, 1995, the Defendant was sentenced to a imprisonment of one year and six months for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) in the Daejeon District Court Branch of the Daejeon District Court; on January 29, 199, the Defendant was sentenced to a imprisonment of one year and six months for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) and a fine of one year and one year and six years for a violation under the same Act in the court.
On February 11, 2010, the Defendant sentenced the Daejeon District Court to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on February 21, 2012.
1. Violation of the Aggravated Punishment Act;
A. On September 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the 581 room of the D Hospital located in Boan-si, Boan-si, B, the Defendant: (b) stolen the victim E, who was hospitalized in the D Hospital, using the crepan in the sick room, with one cell phone of LG-PRO cell phone, one resident registration certificate, and one new co-credit card, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 900,000,000, which was located in the cell phone case owned by the victim.
B. On September 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 04:02, at the H store operated by the Victim G located in the F, the victim was locked in the inside room; (b) using the gaps of surveillance neglected, the Defendant used the gaps of surveillance to use the cell phone cases located on his/her responsibility, the victim’s mobile phone number, one set of 300,000 won, one set of the street I mobile phone, one resident registration certificate, one set of the resident registration certificate, and one modern card.